Understanding the Proposed Change Order (PCO) & Change Order (CO) Process

Construction project management with iMark Commercial - Proposed Change Order (PCO) and Change Order (CO) processes explained.

In the dynamic world of construction and real estate development, it is uncommon for a project to proceed precisely according to the initial plan. Unforeseen challenges, design revisions, and evolving client needs often necessitate adjustments to the original scope of work. When such changes arise, they must be meticulously managed to ensure the project’s success in terms of both budget and timeline. This is where the Proposed Change Order (PCO) process and the Change Order (CO) process become indispensable. At iMark Commercial, we pride ourselves on expertly managing these processes, ensuring all stakeholders are fully informed, and decisions are made with the project’s best interests at heart.

The Critical Role of the PCO & CO Process in Construction

The PCO and CO processes are vital for maintaining control over a construction project. They offer a formal framework for proposing, reviewing, and either approving or rejecting changes to the original contract. Without such a structured approach, changes could lead to confusion, miscommunication, and ultimately, project delays and cost overruns. Moreover, a well-managed PCO and CO process helps preserve relationships between stakeholders, fostering collaboration and trust throughout the project lifecycle.

What is a Proposed Change Order (PCO)?

A Proposed Change Order (PCO) is the formal document submitted when a change to the original contract is proposed. This change could be prompted by various factors, such as unexpected site conditions, client-requested modifications, or necessary design adjustments. The PCO outlines the specific nature of the change, provides justification, and details the potential impacts on both the project’s schedule and budget.

Key Components of a PCO:

  1. GC Recommendation Letter: The process typically begins with a General Contractor (GC) submitting a recommendation letter. This letter serves as the GC’s formal communication to explain why the PCO is necessary and provide a rationale for the proposed change. The GC’s recommendation is crucial because it lays the groundwork for understanding the need for the change and the expected outcomes.
  2. Impact on Schedule: A comprehensive PCO must address how the proposed change will influence the project’s timeline. This includes potential delays or adjustments to the schedule. For example, if the change involves significant alterations to the design or requires additional resources, the PCO should outline how these factors will affect the overall project timeline. Understanding these impacts is essential for all stakeholders to manage expectations and make informed decisions.
  3. Fair Market Value Pricing: The cost associated with the PCO must be calculated precisely to ensure it represents fair market value. This involves a detailed assessment of material costs, labor, equipment, and any other expenses that the change might incur. Transparent and justifiable pricing is key to maintaining the integrity of the project and ensuring that the owner receives value for the additional investment.
  4. Subcontractor/Vendor CO Request & Information: If the proposed change involves work by subcontractors or vendors, their Change Order (CO) requests and supporting documentation must be included in the PCO. This ensures that all related costs are fully accounted for and that the scope of work for each party is clearly defined. This step is crucial for preventing any scope creep or misalignment between the GC and subcontractors/vendors.
  5. Calculation of All Costs, Including GC Margin: A well-prepared PCO includes a thorough calculation of all costs associated with the change, including the General Contractor’s margin. This ensures that the financial implications of the change are fully understood and that there are no hidden costs. By providing a clear breakdown of costs, the PCO allows the owner and architect to assess the financial impact and make informed decisions.

iMark’s Role in the PCO Process

Once the PCO is submitted by the GC, iMark Commercial steps in to perform a detailed evaluation and analysis of the request. Our team of experts meticulously reviews the PCO, considering all aspects of the proposed change, from its impact on the project timeline to its financial implications.

Evaluation and Analysis:

iMark’s first step is to carefully examine the PCO to verify the accuracy of the cost estimates and assess the justification provided by the GC. We analyze the proposed schedule adjustments and evaluate whether the pricing reflects fair market value. Our goal is to ensure that the PCO is reasonable, necessary, and beneficial to the project.

Recommendation to Owner and Architect:

After completing our analysis, iMark prepares a recommendation for the owner and architect. This recommendation includes our assessment of the PCO, the GC’s request, and any additional insights that may be relevant to the decision-making process. Our recommendation is designed to provide the owner and architect with the information they need to make an informed and confident decision.

Architect’s Role:

The architect plays a critical role in the PCO process. After reviewing the PCO and iMark’s recommendation, the architect provides their input to the owner. This input is especially important when the proposed change impacts the design or functionality of the project. The architect’s perspective ensures that the change aligns with the overall design vision and project objectives.

Transition from PCO to CO

The transition from a PCO to a CO is a critical step in the process. Once the PCO has been reviewed by iMark, the architect, and the owner, the owner must decide whether to accept or reject the proposed change. This decision-making process often involves a series of questions and clarifications, addressed through iMark’s coordination efforts.

Owner’s Evaluation:

The owner carefully reviews the PCO, considering its impact on the project’s budget and schedule. If the owner has any questions or concerns, these are communicated back to iMark, the architect, and the GC for resolution. This iterative process ensures that all stakeholders have a clear understanding of the proposed change and that any issues are addressed before a final decision is made.

Acceptance or Rejection:

The owner’s decision to accept or reject the PCO is pivotal. If the owner accepts the PCO, it is formally signed and becomes a Change Order (CO). The CO then becomes an official amendment to the original contract, and the changes outlined in the CO must be implemented by the GC. If the PCO is rejected, the original contract remains in effect, and the proposed change is not executed.

Combining Multiple PCOs into One CO:

In some cases, multiple PCOs may be combined into a single CO. This approach can streamline the process, reduce administrative burden, and simplify the tracking of changes. iMark plays a key role in managing this process, ensuring that all relevant PCOs are accurately documented and that the final CO reflects all approved changes. This consolidated approach helps maintain clarity and organization throughout the project.

iMark’s Comprehensive Management of the CO Process

Once a PCO has been approved and becomes a CO, iMark continues to provide essential management services to ensure the smooth implementation of the change. Our role extends beyond the approval process to include ongoing tracking, communication, and coordination among all stakeholders.

Tracking and Management:

iMark meticulously tracks all COs to ensure that the project remains on schedule and within budget. We monitor the implementation of the COs, addressing any issues that arise, and ensuring that the GC adheres to the terms of the CO. This level of oversight is critical to preventing delays and cost overruns.

Communication and Coordination:

Effective communication is at the heart of successful CO management. iMark serves as the central point of contact, coordinating between the owner, architect, and GC. We ensure that all parties are informed of any developments and that decisions are communicated promptly. This proactive communication strategy helps to avoid misunderstandings and keeps the project on track.

Ensuring Project Success:

By managing the PCO and CO processes with precision and attention to detail, iMark helps to ensure the overall success of the project. Our approach minimizes disruptions, maintains the integrity of the project’s schedule and budget, and fosters a collaborative environment among all stakeholders. Ultimately, our goal is to deliver a completed project that meets or exceeds the owner’s expectations.

Conclusion

The Proposed Change Order (PCO) process and Change Order (CO) process are indispensable components of any construction project. They provide a structured and transparent framework for managing changes, ensuring that projects stay on track and within budget, even when unexpected adjustments are required. At iMark Commercial, we specialize in navigating these processes with expertise and precision, protecting the interests of the owner and ensuring the successful completion of the project. Our commitment to excellence in managing PCOs and COs reflects our dedication to delivering high-quality results and maintaining strong relationships with our clients. By entrusting iMark with the management of your project’s PCO and CO processes, you can be confident that your project is in capable hands from start to finish.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Get In Touch

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.